Ms. Lucy was brought in as a witness by The defense lawyer group which at first was a little unorganized but at the end asked the most relevant questions and did not waste this opportunity to get what they wanted from their witness, the meeting exposed her to the truth of her being a stress reliever to Mr. Rajesh. A few irrelevant questions were asked but proved to be of great importance later on. The prosecution lawyers on the other hand were not at all paying attention and asked questions that raised objections, the most common being asked and answered. The Jury on the other hand was the same as before, not attentive at all and asking questions for the sake of it.
Ms. Lucy said that on the day of the fire she only saw Mr. Rajesh once and that was during him going to the meeting. On that day after her class, she did go to the canteen but doesn't recall smelling anything or seeing anything suspicious. She claimed he was an introvert but 'very, very extrovert with her.' Rajesh and Lucy never talked about Rajesh's wife and only talked once about the Finance issue. Ms. Lucy claims that Rajesh was a smoker but he never smoked in front of her. Lucy was secretive and defending and did not act seriously about the issue at hand. On the mention of his wife, Lucy got emotional and started crying which meant that she was jealous which she claimed others to be.
When serious she claimed that she was on the 2nd floor during the day of the fire and had not seen Mr. Rajesh. After school, she had her coffee and went home she did not see any nervousness on Mr. Rajesh's face during the time she saw him or as she claims. During the whole event, there were clear signs of lying by her but were not pointed out. the prosecutors were irrelevant on the whole but still, the defense, especially a few members got their answers. The objection phrase was thrown about recklessly most of them being relevant but it would not be correct to point out the over usage too. Ms. Lucy was brought on as a witness by The defense lawyer group which at first was a little unorganized but at the end asked the most relevant questions and did not waste this opportunity to get what they wanted from their witness, the meeting exposed her to the truth of her being a stress reliever to Mr. Rajesh. A few irrelevant questions were asked but proved to be of great importance later on. The prosecution lawyers on the other hand were not at all paying attention and asked questions that raised objections, the most common being asked and answered. The Jury on the other hand was the same as before, not attentive at all and asking questions for the sake of it.
Ms. Lucy said that on the day of the fire she only saw Mr. Rajesh once and that was during him going to the meeting. On that day after her class, she did go to the canteen but doesn't recall smelling anything or seeing anything suspicious. She claimed he was an introvert but 'very, very extrovert with her.' Rajesh and Lucy never talked about Rajesh's wife and only talked once about the Finance issue. Ms. Lucy claims that Rajesh was a smoker but he never smoked in front of her. Lucy was secretive and defending and did not act seriously about the issue at hand.
On the mention of his wife, Lucy got emotional and started crying which meant that she was jealous which she claimed others to be. When serious she claimed that she was on the 2nd floor during the day of the fire and had not seen Mr. Rajesh. After school, she had her coffee and went home she did not see any nervousness on Mr. Rajesh's face during the time she saw him or as she claims. During the whole event, there were clear signs of lying by her but were not pointed out. the prosecutors were irrelevant on the whole but still, the defense, especially a few members got their answers. The objection phrase was thrown about recklessly most of them being relevant but it would not be correct to point out the over usage too.
Ameya Tiwari,
New York Times
Comments